This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/5] [1.36.3/1.37/.../3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] C++ sucks, can't you make it better?
- From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 Jun 2003 02:25:17 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/5] [1.36.3/1.37/.../3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] C++ sucks, can't you make it better?
- References: <20000210134559.5.jsm@cygnus.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|C++ sucks, can't you make it|[1 dot 36 dot 3/1 dot 37/
|better? |dot dot dot /3 dot 2/3 dot
| |3/3 dot 4 regression] C++
| |sucks, can't you make it
| |better?
Target Milestone|--- |3 dot 4
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-06-20 02:25 -------
Still hasn't been fixed :-( At least C has recently become something like
exceptions, so the C->C++ regression isn't so bad any more.
I suggest adding templates to C, at which point we can probably
finally forget about this PR.
W.