Bug summary notations (Was Re: [Bug target/11260] [alpha] 'output_operand: floating constant misused' with sqrt(0.0) and -mcpu=ev6)

[Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>]

I'm confused about the need to put [alpha] in front of the summary here.
Remind me again why it makes sense?
You can search for  host/target/build containing alpha quite easily.
At least one of these will show up on the summary.
If even *this* isn't enough, you can use a keyword.

So why is it in the summary?
It's not like regression tracking, which arguably has a need for it.

On Thursday, June 19, 2003, at 08:48  PM, falk at debian dot org wrote:

> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT*  
> gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11260
>
>
> falk at debian dot org changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> -----
>             Summary|code causes 'output_operand:|[alpha]  
> 'output_operand:
>                    |floating constant misused'  |floating constant  
> misused'
>                    |under                       |with sqrt(0 dot 0)  
> and -
>                    |                            |mcpu=ev6
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org  2003-06-20  
> 00:48 -------
> Here's a C test case:
>
> double f(void)
> {
>     return sqrt(0.0);
> }
>
> The ICE does not happen with mainline, most likely because of Roger's  
> sqrt
> constant folding stuff.