This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/11235] pointer to memer function


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11235



------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-06-18 14:54 -------
Subject: Re:  pointer to memer function

because the function which you are passing to fun is declared as const  
and that it wants a non const version, try the following:

struct test
{
     bool f(int *i) const {return *i > 10; }
};

void fun(bool (test::*) (int *) const );

int main(void)
{
     test temp;
     fun(&test::f);
}

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski


On Wednesday, Jun 18, 2003, at 10:49 US/Eastern, adrin_jalali at yahoo  
dot com wrote:

> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT*  
> gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11235
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From adrin_jalali at yahoo dot com   
> 2003-06-18 14:49 -------
> Subject: Re:  pointer to memer function
>
> that's true, but this code can't be compiled too, why?
>
> struct test
> {
>     bool f(int *i) const {return *i > 10; }
> };
>
> void fun(bool (test::*)(int *));
>
> int main(void)
> {
>     test temp;
>     fun(temp.f); -> here can't be compiled again.
> }
>
> --- bangerth at dealii dot org <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT*  
>> gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11235
>>
>>
>> bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
>>
>>            What    |Removed                     |Added
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ------
>>              Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
>>          Resolution|                            |INVALID
>>
>>
>> ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org   
>> 2003-06-18 14:01
>> -------
>> gcc is just right. A member function has type
>>   bool (test::*) (int *)
>> and so doesn't match the argument of fun().
>>
>> W.
>>
>>
>>
>> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
>> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
>
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]