[Bug c/11167] Migrating application from solaris 2.5.1 to Solaris8

["pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11167



------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu  2003-06-17 17:45 -------
Subject: Re:  Migrating application from solaris 2.5.1 to Solaris8

You still think this is a bug in gcc but not a bug in your code.
Even though it worked in Solaris 2.5.1, the program was working by a  
fluke.
The source code is where the bug is, not gcc or Solaris 8.


Thanks,
Andrew Pinski


On Tuesday, Jun 17, 2003, at 13:40 US/Eastern, vinayak shet wrote:

>
> Hi,
> But this code works fine on solaris 2.5.1.
> The same code I have migrated to Solaris 8 and recompiled. And after  
> running this program it fails.
> ?
> Can you please help.
> ?
> Thanks,
> Vinayak
> "pinskia@physics.uc.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT*  
> gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11167
>
>
> pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> -----
> Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
> Resolution| |INVALID
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu 2003-06-17  
> 15:00 -------
> As I said in the other bug:
> The code looks invalid to me, strcpy accesses the memory at location 1  
> which is mostly likely an
> invalid memory locatation.
>
> Also you did not provide the full sources to reproduce this problem so  
> I going to close this as
> invalid because you access memory at location 1 and 2 which causes the  
> segmenation faults.
>
>
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>
>
>
<image.tiff>
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!