This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/9552] [3.3/3.4 regression] [s390] ICE in named_section_flags, at varasm.c
- From: "dhazeghi at yahoo dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 17 Jun 2003 17:07:55 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/9552] [3.3/3.4 regression] [s390] ICE in named_section_flags, at varasm.c
- References: <20030203191601.9552.csd_ob@daudt.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9552
dhazeghi@yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC build triplet|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu |i686-linux-pc-gnu
GCC host triplet|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu |i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu |s390-unknown-linux-gnu
Summary|[x86-64] ICE in |[3.3/3.4 regression] [s390]
|named_section_flags, at |ICE in named_section_flags,
|varasm.c |at varasm.c
Target Milestone|--- |3.3.1
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-06-17 17:07 -------
Okay, I've confirmed the s390 bug. Since that's the only one we have preprocessed source for I'm
changing the bug's summary to reflect that. Confirmed with gcc 3.3 branch and mainline
(20030618). Also discovered that this bug does not occur with gcc 3.2, so this is a regression.