This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/11169] bootstrap failure after passing configure options
- From: "rearnsha at arm dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 12 Jun 2003 17:12:01 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/11169] bootstrap failure after passing configure options
- References: <20030612091735.11169.jeroen.dobbelaere@acunia.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11169
------- Additional Comments From rearnsha@arm.com 2003-06-12 17:11 -------
Subject: Re: bootstrap failure after passing
configure options
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org said:
> So, the default (no flag) means 'fpa', 0x200 means software floating
> point and 0x400 means vfp.
Hmm, yes, you are correct. I was confusing using/missing -msoft-float and
configurations that default to that combination.
More precisely, there are four possible permutations that have to be
supported:
0x000 means hard-float, FPA instructions
0x200 means soft-float, with FPA double ordering (mixed endian)
0x400 means hard-float, VFP instructions
0x600 means soft-float, with VFP double ordering (natural endian)
I wonder if you could try the following patch to GAS, to see if it will
solve the problem:
------- Additional Comments From rearnsha@arm.com 2003-06-12 17:12 -------
Created an attachment (id=4208)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4208&action=view)