This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/11169] bootstrap failure after passing configure options
- From: "rearnsha at arm dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 12 Jun 2003 14:44:00 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/11169] bootstrap failure after passing configure options
- References: <20030612091735.11169.jeroen.dobbelaere@acunia.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11169
------- Additional Comments From rearnsha@arm.com 2003-06-12 14:43 -------
Subject: Re: bootstrap failure after passing
configure options
The problem here is more complex. Unfortunately, arm-linux objects are
marked as as soft-float even though they do in fact contain FPA
instructions (more precisely they are not marked as hard-float, since
not-marked => soft-float). This becomes a problem when you try to link
together an object file that is built with -mfpu=fpa and one that was
built without any -mfpu option, since the linker thinks (incorrectly) that
the two are incompatible.
I see no real solution to this other than to disable the current test in
the linker. In the interim the best solution is to configure your
compiler with --with-tune=xscale --with-arch=armv4t (which is the nearest
combination of options to xscale that will allow production of binary
objects that are backwards compatible).
R.