This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/11163] Can't pass tolower as a parameter
- From: "cda at freshsources dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 12 Jun 2003 00:16:37 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/11163] Can't pass tolower as a parameter
- References: <20030611231858.11163.cda@freshsources.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11163
------- Additional Comments From cda@freshsources.com 2003-06-12 00:16 -------
Subject: Re: Can't pass tolower as a parameter
Hello pinskia,
Wednesday, June 11, 2003, 5:27:00 PM, you wrote:
ppue> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
ppue> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11163
ppue> pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:
ppue> What |Removed |Added
ppue> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
ppue> Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
ppue> Resolution| |DUPLICATE
ppue> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu 2003-06-11 23:26 -------
ppue> An almost except dup of bug 11108, the code is invalid see that bug for more information
ppue> on why.
ppue> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11108 ***
ppue> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
ppue> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
So much for "reputable" committee members :-). The explanation in
11108 makes sense. Thank you.