This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug bootstrap/10983] [3.4 regression] [sparc64-linux ]ICE in verify_wide_reg, at flow.c:552, while compiling libjava


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10983



------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo@libero.it  2003-06-10 10:35 -------
Christian,

it helps if you reduce the testcase to a bare minimum that still segfaults 
(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/minimize.html), and/or you can do a regression hunt to 
find out the patch that caused the regression 
(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/reghunt.html).

If you do both, there are good chances that your bug will get fixed in a decent 
amount of time.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]