This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/10802] Bootstrap of gcc-3.3 on Solaris 9 x86 fails on undefined symbol in libgcj.so
- From: "michaud dot bernard at ic dot gc dot ca" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 3 Jun 2003 19:42:12 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/10802] Bootstrap of gcc-3.3 on Solaris 9 x86 fails on undefined symbol in libgcj.so
- References: <20030515132600.10802.michaud.bernard@ic.gc.ca>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10802
------- Additional Comments From michaud.bernard@ic.gc.ca 2003-06-03 19:42 -------
Subject: RE: Bootstrap of gcc-3.3 on Solaris 9 x86 f
ails on undefined symbol in libgcj.so
Sorry for the delay in answering Dara, things here have been quite hectic...
The gcc 3.2.3 compiler (the version doing the compiling) is installed in
/opt/gcc-3.2.3, and I was trying to build gcc 3.3 to /opt/gcc-3.3.
However, I may have found the cause of the original problem. I found
symbolic links pointing from /usr/local/lib to an older version of gcc-3.2,
as such:
libgcc_s.so -> libgcc_s.so.1
libgcc_s.so.1 -> /opt/gcc-3.2.1/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
This is possibly what is responsible for the build picking up the wrong
version of libgcc, as /usr/local/lib was in my search path.
Regards,
Bernard Michaud
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.