This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/11070] [3.4 regression] ICE in regenerate_decl_from_template after forgotten template for disambiguation
- From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 3 Jun 2003 17:19:51 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/11070] [3.4 regression] ICE in regenerate_decl_from_template after forgotten template for disambiguation
- References: <20030602225302.11070.bangerth@dealii.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11070
giovannibajo@libero.it changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo@libero.it 2003-06-03 17:19 -------
You don't need the explicit template keyword anyway because the postfix-
expression which names the template-id (X<same>::execute) does not depend on
the template parameter T of foo. The code is indeed legal as-is.
Notice that this very problem is already covered by c++/8222
("keyword 'template' required to access member templates in non-dependent
postfix expressions"), so you probably want to close either 11070 or 11071.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.