This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/11070] [3.4 regression] ICE in regenerate_decl_from_template after forgotten template for disambiguation


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11070


giovannibajo@libero.it changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code


------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo@libero.it  2003-06-03 17:19 -------
You don't need the explicit template keyword anyway because the postfix-
expression which names the template-id (X<same>::execute) does not depend on 
the template parameter T of foo. The code is indeed legal as-is. 

Notice that this very problem is already covered by c++/8222 
("keyword 'template' required to access member templates in non-dependent 
postfix expressions"), so you probably want to close either 11070 or 11071.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]