This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug preprocessor/11064] Preprocessor tries to tokenize code that should be unconditionally skipped
- From: "jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 2 Jun 2003 19:51:44 -0000
- Subject: [Bug preprocessor/11064] Preprocessor tries to tokenize code that should be unconditionally skipped
- References: <20030602131615.11064.rschiele@uni-mannheim.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11064
------- Additional Comments From jsm28@cam.ac.uk 2003-06-02 19:51 -------
Subject: Re: Preprocessor tries to tokenize code
that should be unconditionally skipped
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, neil@daikokuya.co.uk wrote:
> Yes, but it leaves tokenization in the case of unterminated quotes to
> the implementation, so we can do either. As the reporter ovserved, 3.4
> accepts the code. 3.3 won't change.
Does 3.4 (a) properly warn for unportable code that has unterminated
quotes (in preprocessing tokens that are not converted to tokens) and (b)
document these extensions (I didn't see any response to
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-04/msg01855.html>)?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.