This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure
- From: "ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 2 Jun 2003 11:48:20 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure
- References: <20030525155628.10974.bugzilla-gcc@thewrittenword.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10974
------- Additional Comments From ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu 2003-06-02 11:48 -------
Subject: Re: Bootstrap failure
> From: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
>
> >>>>> Kaveh R Ghazi writes:
>
> Kaveh> Sure. Though I don't have any AIX boxes at all for testing it. Can I
> Kaveh> assume that you verified physmem is still correctly activated on
> Kaveh> AIX4.3.3 and AIX5?
>
> The patch tests for the existence of the structure member, not a
> specific AIX version. Why are you asking about AIX version numbers?
> David
I want to know if someone had tested the patch in both the negative
*and* the positive case of whether the structure member exists. I
assume albert checked the negative case on his 4.3.2 box. I listed
the AIX version numbers of where I thought the positive case lies.
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.