This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: NEW vs. UNCONFIRMED
- From: Tim Prince <timothyprince at sbcglobal dot net>
- To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>, Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi at yahoo dot com>
- Cc: <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 20:56:44 -0700
- Subject: Re: NEW vs. UNCONFIRMED
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0305312002550.10118-100000@gandalf.ices.utexas.edu>
- Reply-to: tprince at computer dot org
On Saturday 31 May 2003 18:15, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> > Finally, a question about maintainers and bugs. Is there a consensus as
> > to when it is okay to assign a bug to someone, and when it is okay to
> > add someone (who's responsible for the relevant portion of the
> > compiler) to the cc: list of a bug? Thanks,
>
I've been put on the CC: list for all bugs, according to the bugzilla
messages. If this happened for many people, no wonder your server gets
behind.
--
Tim Prince