Re: target/9843: [HPUX] -static still leaves the linker looking f or shl_*

[law at redhat dot com]

In message <A134E2426B46D711BB4B000347AE6E7C76EBBE at xvan02 dot vcd dot hp dot com>, "BONNER,
MATT (HP-Vancouver,ex1)" writes:
 >>> From: law at redhat dot com [mailto:law at redhat dot com]
 >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 10:43 AM
 >>> To: BONNER,MATT (HP-Vancouver,ex1)
 >>> Cc: 'John David Anglin'; danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org; gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org;
 >>> gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org; nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org; gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
 >>> Subject: Re: target/9843: [HPUX] -static still leaves the linker looking
 >f or shl_*
 >>> 
 >>> 
 >>> In message 
 >>> <A134E2426B46D711BB4B000347AE6E7C76EBBD at xvan02 dot vcd dot hp dot com>, "BONNER,
 >MATT" writes:
 >>>  >Hmmm...
 >>>  >
 >>>  >Maybe all is still not well.  When I move an executable compiled with
 >>>  >all this stuff from an HP-UX 11 machine to an HP-UX machine, I get
 >>>  >
 >>>  >/usr/lib/dld.sl: Can't open shared library: /usr/lib/libdld.2
 >>>  >/usr/lib/dld.sl: No such file or directory
 >>>  >IOT trap
 >>>  >
 >>>  >I'm hunting around as I write this, but if you know what I'm doing
 >>>  >wrong now, please let me know.  Or if the answer is "You can't run
 >>>  >11 executables on 10." :-)
 >>>
 >>> You can't run hpux11 executables on an hpux10 system.
 >
 >Okay.  Bummer.  However, I'm still confused.  I thought all these -Wl,-E,+n
 >commands were to link statically.  Why, then, is the executable looking for
 >shared library libdld.2?
Because it's impossible to build a true static executable on hpux11.
jeff