This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: target/9843: [HPUX] -static still leaves the linker looking f or shl_*
- From: "BONNER,MATT (HP-Vancouver,ex1)" <matt dot bonner at hp dot com>
- To: "'law at redhat dot com'" <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: 'John David Anglin' <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>,danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 14:15:37 -0500
- Subject: RE: target/9843: [HPUX] -static still leaves the linker looking f or shl_*
>> From: law at redhat dot com [mailto:law at redhat dot com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 10:43 AM
>> To: BONNER,MATT (HP-Vancouver,ex1)
>> Cc: 'John David Anglin'; danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org; gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org;
>> gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org; nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org; gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
>> Subject: Re: target/9843: [HPUX] -static still leaves the linker looking
f or shl_*
>>
>>
>> In message
>> <A134E2426B46D711BB4B000347AE6E7C76EBBD at xvan02 dot vcd dot hp dot com>, "BONNER,
MATT" writes:
>> >Hmmm...
>> >
>> >Maybe all is still not well. When I move an executable compiled with
>> >all this stuff from an HP-UX 11 machine to an HP-UX machine, I get
>> >
>> >/usr/lib/dld.sl: Can't open shared library: /usr/lib/libdld.2
>> >/usr/lib/dld.sl: No such file or directory
>> >IOT trap
>> >
>> >I'm hunting around as I write this, but if you know what I'm doing
>> >wrong now, please let me know. Or if the answer is "You can't run
>> >11 executables on 10." :-)
>>
>> You can't run hpux11 executables on an hpux10 system.
Okay. Bummer. However, I'm still confused. I thought all these -Wl,-E,+n
commands were to link statically. Why, then, is the executable looking for
shared library libdld.2?
thanks,
Matt