This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: other/8948: [3.3 regression] Definition of __i686 causes bigProblems


http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8948

The definition of __i686 has been present in gcc all along; removing it will
cause other regressions (any code that depends on it will break), so that's not an
option.

Will glibc-2.3.1 build with older gcc's? If so, why isn't there trouble from
sysdep.h in such cases?

Volker, you are calling this a regression, but do older gcc's actually work?
If so, how? They define __i686 too, in exactly the same way.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]