This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: optimization/7325: Test "if ( a && b )" where a, b are 1-bit fields, could be better
- From: bangerth at dealii dot org
- To: falk at efalk dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Jan 2003 01:51:50 -0000
- Subject: Re: optimization/7325: Test "if ( a && b )" where a, b are 1-bit fields, could be better
- Reply-to: bangerth at dealii dot org, falk at efalk dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Synopsis: Test "if ( a && b )" where a, b are 1-bit fields, could be better
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Tue Jan 7 17:51:49 2003
State-Changed-Why:
The code generated by 3.4 is more complex with a lot
of jumping around, but the issue basically still applies.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7325