This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/8772: Segmentation fault on 3 lines of template code
- From: bangerth at dealii dot org
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, sneechy at hotmail dot com
- Date: 2 Dec 2002 20:45:31 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/8772: Segmentation fault on 3 lines of template code
- Reply-to: bangerth at dealii dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, sneechy at hotmail dot com, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Synopsis: Segmentation fault on 3 lines of template code
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Mon Dec 2 12:45:29 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Others have confirmed this already.
However, just for the record: I fail to see how this can be
made legal: when you write A<n>::B to denote the template
type, B is a template dependent type, and one would think
one has to write a "typename" somewhere. But then we have
typename A<n>::B
which is not the name of a type, but of a template. I don't
know what the standard says here, but I don't see a way to
make it legal in any case.
More reference: icc7 also rejects the code, both with
and without the "typename".
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8772