This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Possible errors in call to output_operand_lossage?
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 08:49:57PM +0100, Philipp Thomas wrote:
> Your comment implies that the original use was incorrect as printf
> style was assumed by whoever wrote the code and that things like %%R
> where meant to be output as %R.
Exactly why I suggested making output_operand_lossage take printf
arguments rather than fix them all up.
> If so, only those messages that use a single '%' would have to be
> changed, right?
Yes.
r~