This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Possible errors in call to output_operand_lossage?

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Philipp Thomas <pthomas at suse dot de>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 09:30:30 -0800
Subject: Re: Possible errors in call to output_operand_lossage?
References: <20020202000349.L30996@jeffreys.suse.de> <20020201150823.A10785@redhat.com> <20020202001220.N30996@jeffreys.suse.de> <20020201151322.C10785@redhat.com> <20020205161126.T30996@jeffreys.suse.de>

On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 04:11:26PM +0100, Philipp Thomas wrote:
> My question now is how to verify I didn't goof when inserting the necessary
> comments. Would it suffice to configure a cross-compiler for the given cpu
> and then just build the respective object file (i.e. arc.o, m88k.o etc. )?

Yes, that should be good enough.


r~

References:
- Possible errors in call to output_operand_lossage?
  - From: Philipp Thomas
- Re: Possible errors in call to output_operand_lossage?
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Possible errors in call to output_operand_lossage?
  - From: Philipp Thomas
- Re: Possible errors in call to output_operand_lossage?
  - From: Philipp Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]