This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/4122: undefined reference to `non-virtual thunk to ...'
- From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Robert Boehne <rboehne at ricardo-us dot com>, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, juergen at monocerus dot demon dot co dot uk, boehme at informatik dot hu-berlin dot de, loewis at informatik dot hu-berlin dot de, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, michael at ritzert dot de, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 12:51:55 +0000
- Subject: Re: c++/4122: undefined reference to `non-virtual thunk to ...'
- Organization: Codesourcery LLC
- References: <3C21517D.23651617@ricardo-us.com> <wvllmfyd1uo.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com>
Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> No, it should never be necessary to generate thunks with the vtable; if
> there's a thunk missing, either it should be generated with the function or
> it should not be needed.
Shall I look at this, or are you?
nathan
--
Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org