This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again

From: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
To: amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 23:23:20 -0500
Subject: Re: R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again
References: <200112190231.fBJ2VZK08687@greed.delorie.com> <20011219132637.S29130@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <200112190301.fBJ31mA16401@envy.delorie.com> <20011219135147.T29130@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <200112190336.fBJ3a2C16681@envy.delorie.com> <20011219145211.U29130@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>


> glibc's sparc32/dl-machine.h looks wrong to me.

Um, I'm on sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

References:
- R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]