This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/3099: cygwin: Many g++ EH failures
- To: rodrigc at gcc dot gnu dot org, David dot Billinghurst at riotinto dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: c++/3099: cygwin: Many g++ EH failures
- From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at mediaone dot net>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 22:41:13 -0500
- Cc: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20011110021841.29648.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com> <20011110021841.29648.qmail@sources.redhat.com> <20011109215923.A14082@redhat.com>
Hi,
Next time you follow-up to a problem report in GNATS,
please make sure that gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org is in
your CC: list. That is the way that e-mails are appended
to GNATS problem reports.
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 09:59:23PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 02:18:41AM -0000, rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
> >Synopsis: cygwin: Many g++ EH failures
> >
> >State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
> >State-Changed-By: rodrigc
> >State-Changed-When: Fri Nov 9 18:18:40 2001
> >State-Changed-Why:
> > No feedback.
> >
> >http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=3099&database=gcc
>
> Actually, feedback was provided. It didn't make it into the PR, though:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2001-06/msg00595.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg01171.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg01156.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg01139.html
>
> I don't think I ever got any further feedback from Richard after my last
> message. That's fine, but I don't think the PR should be closed unless
> the problem is actually fixed.
>
> And, in general, I don't think that one request for feedback with no
> reply should cause a close of the PR.
>
> cgf