This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/3099: cygwin: Many g++ EH failures
- To: rodrigc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: c++/3099: cygwin: Many g++ EH failures
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 21:59:23 -0500
- Cc: David dot Billinghurst at riotinto dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20011110021841.29648.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 02:18:41AM -0000, rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
>Synopsis: cygwin: Many g++ EH failures
>
>State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
>State-Changed-By: rodrigc
>State-Changed-When: Fri Nov 9 18:18:40 2001
>State-Changed-Why:
> No feedback.
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=3099&database=gcc
Actually, feedback was provided. It didn't make it into the PR, though:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2001-06/msg00595.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg01171.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg01156.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg01139.html
I don't think I ever got any further feedback from Richard after my last
message. That's fine, but I don't think the PR should be closed unless
the problem is actually fixed.
And, in general, I don't think that one request for feedback with no
reply should cause a close of the PR.
cgf