This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [C++] g++.other/enum5.C

To: Ben Elliston <bje at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: [C++] g++.other/enum5.C
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 22:02:41 -0700
Cc: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>, Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <15195.22125.402253.391958@scooby.brisbane.redhat.com> <20010723000834.B5382@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <15195.27160.832964.350287@scooby.brisbane.redhat.com>

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 10:04:40AM +1000, Ben Elliston wrote:
> Except that this is not the intended purpose of XFAIL in DejaGnu.

No, but it's the only sane course of action when one needs to check
for regressions, and more than two people are adding test cases.

It is also the Way Things Are Done in g++ land.  Please add the
XFAIL as requested.


r~

References:
- Re: [C++] g++.other/enum5.C
  - From: Ben Elliston
- Re: [C++] g++.other/enum5.C
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: [C++] g++.other/enum5.C
  - From: Ben Elliston

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]