This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [C++] g++.other/enum5.C

To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
Subject: Re: [C++] g++.other/enum5.C
From: Ben Elliston <bje at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 10:04:40 +1000 (EST)
Cc: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <15195.22125.402253.391958@scooby.brisbane.redhat.com><20010723000834.B5382@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>

>>>>> "Neil" == Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> writes:

  Neil> IMO we should xfail enum5.C.  After all, (almost) every xfail is a bug
  Neil> we should be trying to fix eventually; I don't think anyone is in any
  Neil> danger of forgetting that.

Except that this is not the intended purpose of XFAIL in DejaGnu.

Ben

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++] g++.other/enum5.C
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [C++] g++.other/enum5.C
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- Re: [C++] g++.other/enum5.C
  - From: Ben Elliston
- Re: [C++] g++.other/enum5.C
  - From: Neil Booth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]