Re: libstdc++/3174: sparc-rtems (also seen on i386-rtems)

[Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com>]

bkoz@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
> 
> Synopsis: sparc-rtems (also seen on i386-rtems)
> 
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->bkoz
> Responsible-Changed-By: bkoz
> Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jun 13 19:41:31 2001
> Responsible-Changed-Why:
>     Mine.
> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> State-Changed-By: bkoz
> State-Changed-When: Wed Jun 13 19:41:31 2001
> State-Changed-Why:
>     Your sources are from 2001-06-11. I fixed this yesterday, just for you.
> 
>     Here:
>     http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg00830.html
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=3174&database=gcc

This does not seem to solve the problem.  This only inverts the test
without
altering which compiler is being used in the test.  See this:

$ cat /tmp/j | /lib/cpp
# 1 ""
  
    not_ok


$ cat /tmp/j
  #if __GNUC__ < 3
    not_ok
  #endif

The problem is that (as reported in the original report), CXXCPP
is the native C++ compiler not the cross one just built.

I am waiting on a build to finish to confirm this but have serious
doubts.

-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
joel@OARcorp.com                 On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
   Support Available             (256) 722-9985