This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Compilation problems w/ 2.95.3 on Sun Solaris 2.5.1 (fully patched)


I tried again.  Another error, but not the ld error:

make[3]: Entering directory
`/export/home1/wwinzer/mybuild/BUILD/gcc-2.95.3/gcc/java'
stage2/xgcc -Bstage2/ -B/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1/bin/ -c  -DIN_GCC  -DSVR4
-g -O3     -I. -I.. -I. -I./.. -I./../config -I./../../include parse.c
xgcc: Internal compiler error: program as got fatal signal 10
make[3]: *** [parse.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/export/home1/wwinzer/mybuild/BUILD/gcc-2.95.3/gcc/java'

make[2]: *** [jc1] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/export/home1/wwinzer/mybuild/BUILD/gcc-2.95.3/gcc'
make[1]: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/export/home1/wwinzer/mybuild/BUILD/gcc-2.95.3/gcc'
make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2

- Wally Winzer Jr.

"Auteria Wally Winzer Jr." wrote:

> I don't believe the linker on Solaris-2.5.1 is broken.  The linker patch
> is in place:
>
> 103627    15     CURRENT  SunOS 5.5.1: Linker patch
>
> I've compiled everything from perl to every version of gcc from 2.95.2
> and below w/ no problems.  I've even recompiled gcc-2.95.2 to see
> whether I get the same error @ the location mentioned below.  Not
> applicable.  Did anyone tested the compilation on Solaris-2.5.1
> (fully-patched OS)? It doesn't look like it, otherwise you and the gcc
> group would've seen this problem and fixed it.  GNU's ld and as isn't
> recommended to be used on Solaris, for their linker and assembler is
> broken, even though there are admins that use it.  I don't.
>
> This is indeed a bug within 2.95.3.  You don't want to admit it because
> your group doesn't have the resources to test on Solaris-2.5.1.  Solaris'es
> linker and assembler isn't broken.  I'm speculating testing was done on
> Solaris-2.6 and above.  Until this is fixed I'll be using 2.95.2, which hasn't
> caused me any headaches.
>
> When will gcc have the ability to compile in 64-bit mode? Unfortunately
> there are apps that I have to compile in 64-bit mode to work, and noone
> wants to use Forte 6.0 (Sun SPARCompilers C & CC).
>
> - Wally Winzer Jr.
>
> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> > On Apr 25, 2001, "Auteria Wally Winzer Jr." <wally.winzer@ChampUSA.COM> wrote:
> >
> > > collect2: ld terminated with signal 10 [Bus Error], core dumped
> >
> > Looks like the linker is broken.  Not a problem in GCC.  Try upgrading
> > the linker.
> >
> > --
> > Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
> > Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
> > CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
> > Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]