This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: x86 C compiler problem 2.95.2 (latest snapshot may be ok)


On Mar 28, 2000, Urban Widmark <urban@svenskatest.se> wrote:

> On 28 Mar 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Mar 28, 2000, Urban Widmark <urban@svenskatest.se> wrote:
>> 
>> > When testing the attached problem with the latest compiler snapshot on
>> >   http://www.codesourcery.com/gcc-compile.html		(cool!)
>> > I could not see the problem.
>> 
>> If the bug has already been fixed, we can only thank you and close the
>> bug report :-)

> Ah, but that was the point of sending it. How do I know that the webform
> is running an up-to-date snapshot? That it actually passes my optimization
> flags to the compiler? ... (I'm getting a positive results by compiling in
> a very strange way, why assume that it is fixed?)

I'd just assumed you were pointing us to the web-page about nightly
snapshots that CodeSourcery creates.  I had missed the fact that the
web-page you pointed to would actually compile the code.  I didn't
know such a great thing existed.  Nice work, CodeSourcery!

Anyway, now that you mentioned it, I've actually tried your code with
20000327's snapshot, and, surprisingly, it produces the output you
claim to be incorrect, so I'll keep the bug report in my mail folder
for later perusal, unless someone else acknowledges that it is fixed
or moves it into gnats.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva    Enjoy Guaranį, see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company        aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com
Free Software Developer and Evangelist    CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}   Write to mailing lists, not to me


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]