This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Regressions caused by copy_string patch.

From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
To: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
Cc: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu>, fxcoudert at gmail dot com, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, jvdelisle at verizon dot net
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:05:53 -0700
Subject: Re: Regressions caused by copy_string patch.
References: <20060714191529.1B3BE10028@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> <44B80156.6030105@wanadoo.fr> <20060714205011.GA6979@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <44B81AAA.6090900@wanadoo.fr> <20060714224329.GA34518@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 03:43:29PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 12:28:58AM +0200, Paul Thomas wrote:
> > Steve,
> > 
> > >% grep builtin_memmove actual_array_substr_2.f90.003t.original | wc -l
> > >     11
> > >
> > >% grep builtin_memset actual_array_substr_2.f90.003t.original | wc -l
> > >      3
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > It helps to look at the right bit of code! I agree with the above.
> > 
> 
> You know this stuff better than I.  Do we need a gfc_evalaute_now()
> in gfc_trans_string_copy()?  Here's a new testcase

That's it!  I have a patch!!

-- 
Steve

References:
- Re: Regressions caused by copy_string patch.
  - From: Jack Howarth
- Re: Regressions caused by copy_string patch.
  - From: Paul Thomas
- Re: Regressions caused by copy_string patch.
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: Regressions caused by copy_string patch.
  - From: Paul Thomas
- Re: Regressions caused by copy_string patch.
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]