This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: Regressions caused by copy_string patch.
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
- Cc: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu>, fxcoudert at gmail dot com, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, jvdelisle at verizon dot net
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:50:11 -0700
- Subject: Re: Regressions caused by copy_string patch.
- References: <20060714191529.1B3BE10028@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> <44B80156.6030105@wanadoo.fr>
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 10:40:54PM +0200, Paul Thomas wrote:
> Are you all absolutely sure that FX's patch is the problem here? No
> matter what, FX's patch should produce an BUILT_IN_MEMMOVE someplace. I
> do not see such a call in the code produced by actual_array_substr_2.f90
>
> Equally, however, I do not see any type mismatches in my patch.
>
Yes, it is FX's patch. Trunk-patch works. Trunk+patch fails.
% grep builtin_memmove actual_array_substr_2.f90.003t.original | wc -l
11
% grep builtin_memset actual_array_substr_2.f90.003t.original | wc -l
3
--
Steve