This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Thumbs up or thumbs down: stl_config.h ?
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: Thumbs up or thumbs down: stl_config.h ?
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: 16 Feb 2001 22:19:04 +0100
- Cc: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, austern at research dot att dot com
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1010216130812.11782A-100000@taarna.cygnus.com>
Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
| > If we're going to have the CPLUSPLUS_CPP_SPEC use '-include c++config.h'
| > can we consider axing bits/stl_config.h? It has lots of stuff for other
| > platforms which cpplib is just going to waste time removing. It splits
| > configuration between two files. And there's at least one PR due to
| > stl_config.h not being picked up anymore, resulting in unexpanded macros
| > arriving in the parser.
|
| yes! please do this. You can take the _GNU_ bits and add them to
| inclue/bits/c++config.h to start with, and substitue c++config.h insted
| of stl_config
100% agreed.
| eventually we want to remove the uncesessary code from the STL itself. I
| think Matt is doing this anyway, so I don't want to duplicate efforts.
Is there a chance to have V3 maintainers to have closer look at what
is going on on Matt's side?
-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com