This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Thumbs up or thumbs down: stl_config.h ?
- To: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Subject: Re: Thumbs up or thumbs down: stl_config.h ?
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:10:35 -0800 (PST)
- cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, austern at research dot att dot com
> If we're going to have the CPLUSPLUS_CPP_SPEC use '-include c++config.h'
> can we consider axing bits/stl_config.h? It has lots of stuff for other
> platforms which cpplib is just going to waste time removing. It splits
> configuration between two files. And there's at least one PR due to
> stl_config.h not being picked up anymore, resulting in unexpanded macros
> arriving in the parser.
yes! please do this. You can take the _GNU_ bits and add them to
inclue/bits/c++config.h to start with, and substitue c++config.h insted
of stl_config
eventually we want to remove the uncesessary code from the STL itself. I
think Matt is doing this anyway, so I don't want to duplicate efforts.
Matt?
-benjamin