Re: [patch] make gij command-line compatible with java

[Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>]

>>>>> "Tom" == Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim@redhat.com> writes:

Tom> This new patch incorporates all your suggestions and updates the
Tom> manual's CNI and "Invoking gij" sections.

Thanks for making these changes.  There are a couple little problems
with the texi change, then I think it is good to go.

Tom> +supported @code{-X} options.  Currently these options are supported:
Tom> +
Tom> +@item -Xms@var{size}
Tom> +Set the initial heap size.
Tom> +
Tom> +@item -Xmx@var{size}
Tom> +Set the maximum heap size.
Tom> +

I think this will format somewhat strangely, since these @items will
appear with the main list.  I think probably a sub-list is needed
instead, meaning a nested @table.  (Though I'm not completely sure
that nested @tables are allowed in texinfo, you'd have to look.)

Tom> +@code{gij} also recognizes and ignores the following options, for
Tom> +compatibility with existing application launch scripts: -client,
Tom> +-server, -hotspot, -jrockit, -agentlib, -agentpath, -debug, -d32,
Tom> +-d64, -javaagent and -noclassgc.

Options mentioned in plain text should be wrapped in @code{}.

Tom> +Calls malloc.  Throws java.lang.OutOfMemoryError if alloction fails.

Typo "alloction".  Also, function and class names should be wrapped
in @code{}.  There are a few instances of this.

Tom