This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch: replace mutex with object synchronization

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 21 Apr 2004 12:46:18 -0600
Subject: Re: Patch: replace mutex with object synchronization
References: <4085BDEC.80202@bothner.com><Pine.LNX.4.44.0404211235400.32441-100000@ops2.one-point.com><16518.42612.128737.15465@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><874qrdutyo.fsf@fleche.redhat.com><16518.45907.860328.183971@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

Andrew> That might be true, but there's a significant problem: it's
Andrew> important to be able to access the otable in a single memory
Andrew> access.

You'd even mentioned this yesterday and it didn't stick.  Thanks.

Tom

References:
- Re: Patch: replace mutex with object synchronization
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: Patch: replace mutex with object synchronization
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: Patch: replace mutex with object synchronization
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Patch: replace mutex with object synchronization
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Patch: replace mutex with object synchronization
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]