This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 02:27:54PM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote:(insn 31 29 49 5 (set (mem/s/j:SI (plus:SI (reg/v/f:SI 47 [ env ]) (const_int 4 [0x4])) [0 <variable>.ex+0 S4 A32]) (mem/f:SI (plus:SI (plus:SI (reg:SI 55) (reg:SI 56)) (const_int 4092 [0xffc])) [0 S4 A32]))
Guh.
Well, I suppose this is no different from a fp arith insn with a pre-reload memory input that gets reloaded into a register. I suppose there's no invariant that I can enforce.
If you look at the version of fixup_abnormal_edges before my patch you'll see a bit that calls find_many_sub_blocks; re-add that hunk and remove the assert in fixup_eh_region_note, then re-test.
Attachment:
t.diff.txt
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |