Re: [tree-ssa] Use of build_binary_op

[Pop Sébastian <pop at gauvain dot u-strasbg dot fr>]

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 11:57:18AM +0100, Jason Merrill wrote:
> 
> > - a gimple_expand_body() to optimize a function body and expand to RTL.
> 
> I don't think we need to require GIMPLE form when we enter the tree
> equivalent of rest_of_compilation; anything which simplify_expr can handle
> should be fine.  I agree that much of the stuff currently in c_expand_body
> needs to move into a language-independent file.
> 

Just a question about documentation:
is the .fig format ok for writing graphic documentation for GCC?

If yes, then here is a call-graph for the C/C++ expand_body (tree to RTL translation).
It is not complete but that's enough for getting the main idea of the 
control flow and the call graph.

Attachment: expand_body_stmt.fig
Description: application/xfig

Attachment: expand_body_stmt.png
Description: PNG image