This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.0 Bugs: Call for Volunteers
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.0 Bugs: Call for Volunteers
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 00:10:16 +0000 (GMT)
- cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> - If it is not fixed, check to see whether or not it occurs with
> GCC 2.95.2.
> If so, and the priority of the bug is presently "high" reset it to
> "medium". Otherwise, do nothing.
> - Otherwise, the bug is not fixed, and represents a regression from
> GCC 2.95.2. How embarassing!
> In that case, mark the bug as having "high" priority.
Shouldn't bugs confirmed as genuine bugs that are still present be changed
from "open" to "analyzed" to record that they have been verified as
present in the compiler as of a given date? This seems to be the practice
that has been followed (somewhat erratically) with the GCC GNATS database
in the past.
Joseph S. Myers