This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] PR21990

From: Denis Chertykov <denisc at overta dot ru>
To: Bjіrn Haase <bjoern dot m dot haase at web dot de>
Cc: Denis Chertykov <denisc at overta dot ru>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 06 Sep 2005 22:30:43 +0400
Subject: Re: [Patch] PR21990
References: <200509041253.55167.bjoern.m.haase@web.de><200509060931.59050.bjoern.m.haase@web.de><hdcytb5z.fsf@localhost.localdomain><200509061907.30708.bjoern.m.haase@web.de>

Björn Haase <bjoern.m.haase@web.de> writes:

> Denis Chertykov wrote on Dienstag, 6. September 2005 18:26 :
> > I think that reload can try to check r28:r29 (frame pointer) for
> > Pmode. (may be not today may be in the future)
> > I'm worry about this.
> It seems that reload does take it to be guaranteed that the frame pointer 
> register could always hold a Pmode object ;-). The result of 
> avr_hard_regno_mode_ok seems to be used only for the other registers, those 
> that are managed by the register allocator.
> 
> I am not too worried about an eventual problem in the future.

I'm worried.
The better way is to ask a general maintainers.

Denis.

References:
- Re: [Patch] PR21990
  - From: Björn Haase
- Re: [Patch] PR21990
  - From: Denis Chertykov
- Re: [Patch] PR21990
  - From: Björn Haase

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]