This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
This patch is OK.This patch adds a caveat to /gcc-3.4/changes.html regarding libstdc++/11953 and gives the suggested workaround for Boost, as I suggested doing long ago on the PR.
Is the wording OK? Is linking straight to Boost and giving the
workaround OK, or should I direct people to a mail on the Boost
list instead?
-- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC (916) 791-8304 mark@codesourcery.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |