This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] posix names merge with gcc-3_2-branch

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: Andreas Tobler <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 13:52:49 -0500
Subject: Re: [v3] posix names merge with gcc-3_2-branch
Organization: Red Hat / Chicago
References: <3DA6D881.7040806@pop.agri.ch><20021012205219.54850f56.bkoz@redhat.com><3DA93886.5030502@pop.agri.ch><20021013131916.3f089d37.bkoz@redhat.com><3DA9BAE4.2050201@pop.agri.ch>

> Ah, I had no regression on darwin6.1 between 10/10 and today on the trunk.

Great. It looks like it's ok for darwin then.

It looks like BSD (which I'm more concerned with, actually) and some
linux systems are still having problems so I'll wait a bit more.

-benjamin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v3] posix names merge with gcc-3_2-branch
  - From: Andreas Tobler

References:
- RE: [v3] posix names merge with gcc-3_2-branch
  - From: Andreas Tobler
- Re: [v3] posix names merge with gcc-3_2-branch
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [v3] posix names merge with gcc-3_2-branch
  - From: Andreas Tobler
- Re: [v3] posix names merge with gcc-3_2-branch
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [v3] posix names merge with gcc-3_2-branch
  - From: Andreas Tobler

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]