This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [gfortran,patch] Fix code generated for NINT
- From: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
- To: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
- Cc: GFORTRAN list <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GCC-patches list <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 22:44:19 +0100
- Subject: Re: [gfortran,patch] Fix code generated for NINT
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=deKZzlavx2/U1bISOzqSoMgnql88nQwHv4wpqHE/zfqGSpuvrVOKM/1I+r6Ly71ITePR5EsvX4eDD8R9VtUftemOp2gZt1jha8sCYgIJ8mKSicwvrK0iStE2t+yFs5qIIua8vpbNY5gCbN7Zczf/hwJh7KeewNrEatJTVW+XnTk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=YEGFd3YAYaO04r0MwE3TjUGpCUiW7rIMeobSNxCvzEjcl4oTw2QXyJX0rbOs5sbLAp5EPCtqWxZspIYJtyta7wbNqTXig6HlOTLwlJ7DaTqdc1c5//bfAnUZzpIQKN9Cag3NI9oMm90/mfqbhOewqsS1AIZXyV7Qg4ko5Y71dDs=
- References: <1EFD0FF2-E8B1-42F8-9A15-9928DAA7BAF7@gmail.com> <46AFABE4.2010707@wanadoo.fr>
Does Cygwin comply? I am just about to launch a regtest. I am only
asking because the consequences of the NINT bug are particularly
dire. :-)
Yes, I know. I have lots of code myself which will probably get a
large hit in performance due to that patch, and I was really
reluctant to do it for such a simple case, but I can't find another
way of fixing it :(
Oh, and by the way, a cygwin test can only help, though I think it
has lround.
FX