This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bug fc003

From: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
To: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org,Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>,FX Coudert <Francois-Xavier dot Coudert at lcp dot u-psud dot fr>,Walt Brainerd <walt at fortran dot com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 01:09:08 +0200
Subject: Re: bug fc003
References: <4246D6CD.90202@fortran.com> <200503282001.25904.paul@codesourcery.com> <424887C7.1020409@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <200503282350.07172.paul@codesourcery.com>

Paul Brook wrote:
> IIUC we already know that we're dealing with a file, so why does changing 
> unlink to remove make any difference?
> 
> Is cygwin unlink borken?

OK, let me rephrase.  First, I don't know what platform (cygwin or mingw) Walt
uses, but I do know that this test doesn't work for him.  Second, unlike
unlink, remove is ISO C, so it seemed to me that this would be something to
try.  I don't know if it makes any difference: I said that I couldn't test it,
but it seemed to be the only place where a system dependency can come into play.

- Tobi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bug fc003
  - From: Steve Kargl

References:
- bug fc003
  - From: Walt Brainerd
- Re: bug fc003
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: bug fc003
  - From: Tobias Schlüter
- Re: bug fc003
  - From: Paul Brook

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]