This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bug fc003

From: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
To: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>,Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>,FX Coudert <Francois-Xavier dot Coudert at lcp dot u-psud dot fr>,Walt Brainerd <walt at fortran dot com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:01:25 +0100
Subject: Re: bug fc003
Organization: CodeSourcery
References: <4246D6CD.90202@fortran.com> <20050328183841.GA69540@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <424852C7.2090803@physik.uni-muenchen.de>

On Monday 28 March 2005 19:53, Tobias Schlüter wrote:
> Steve Kargl wrote:
> > Okay, I haven't looked at unix.c, but I do want to note
> > that remove and unlink have different semantics, particularly
> > if path is a directory.
>
> Understood, but delete_file is only called from st_close(), so it would be
> what the user requested.

What makes you think your patch fixes the problem?
The linux manpage says "calls unlink for files".
If it does fix the problem it needs a comment saying why.

Paul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bug fc003
  - From: Tobias Schlüter

References:
- bug fc003
  - From: Walt Brainerd
- Re: bug fc003
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: bug fc003
  - From: Tobias Schlüter

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]