Bug 56107 - [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_optional_2.f90 -O2 execution test
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_optional_2.f90 -O2 execution test
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 55978
Alias: None
Product: gcc
Classification: Unclassified
Component: fortran (show other bugs)
Version: 4.8.0
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: 4.8.0
Assignee: Not yet assigned to anyone
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-01-25 13:48 UTC by Uroš Bizjak
Modified: 2013-01-25 17:44 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Build:
Known to work:
Known to fail:
Last reconfirmed:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Uroš Bizjak 2013-01-25 13:48:41 UTC 
Recent gfortran regression on i686-pc-linux-gnu:

Program aborted. Backtrace:
#0  0xF7EC75C3
#1  0xF7EC903F
#2  0xF7F80A67
#3  0x80488F4 in a3a1.2065.constprop.8 at class_optional_2.f90:0
FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_optional_2.f90  -O2  execution test

Regressed between revision 195413 vs revision 195410 [1].

Added CCs of suspected comitters.

[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2013-01/msg00255.html
Comment 1 janus 2013-01-25 14:27:10 UTC 
This is probably a duplicate of PR 55978 (which, however, was claimed to be due to r195125, which does not match the interval in comment 0).
Comment 2 Dominique d'Humieres 2013-01-25 17:44:18 UTC 
As said in pr55978 comment #2, the bug is latent on some platforms (e.g., darwin) so it may not be triggered by the testsuite and may need to use valgrind to see it. As any latent bug it may be exposed in the test suite by unrelated changes (I still don't see it on darwin at r195432). Si I am marking the PR as a duplicate of pr55978.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 55978 ***