downloaded the gnu.rex package from the following website http://www.crocodile.org/~sts/Rex/ and ran the test program using the command line option'java -test khadafy.inp'. and got the result a different result than the command line option './rxT -test khadafy.inp'. The difference between the two was that the former was compiled and executed using a JDK while the latter was executed using gcj. The problem appears to have the interpretation of the string "M[ou]\'?am+[ae]r .*\([AEae]l[- ]\)?[GKQ]h?[aeu]+\([dtz][dhz]?\)+af[iy]". However, both executions were the same when if the gnu.rex java files were compiled with the corresponding compiler. gcj only has trouble reading the .class files generated by some other compiler. Mathew Release: 3.1 Environment: Linux 2.4 Red Hat 7.1 intel Pentium 4
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> To: mkuruvil@yahoo.co.in Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libgcj/5364: .class files not being interpreted correctly Date: 12 Jan 2002 14:06:59 -0700 >>>>> "Mathew" == mkuruvil <mkuruvil@yahoo.co.in> writes: Mathew> However, both executions were the same when if the gnu.rex Mathew> java files were compiled with the corresponding compiler. gcj Mathew> only has trouble reading the .class files generated by some Mathew> other compiler. I looked at this a little bit. `gij' gets the same results as `java', but a `gcj'-compiled executable gets different results. So it looks like a compiler bug (and not a library problem or something like that). Tom
Hello, this bug was reported over a year ago. Is this issue still present with current versions of gcc (3.3)? Thanks, Dara
Subject: Re: [Bug libgcj/5364] .class files not being interpreted correctly I don't know :-) Man!! 1 year is such a long time, though it may not seem that long for some things (like where you were etc.). But in the field of computers, that's a decade!! I do remember reporting this problem. But I have not tested it with the latest version of gcc. I remember using gcc3.0 as well as the latest version at the time that I reported it. In any case, it seems straightforward to test it. I might check it out in the next 3 weeks. No promises. If I do, I'll let you know. I have no need for it now. --- "dhazeghi@yahoo.com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* > gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5364 > > > > ------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com > 2003-05-25 03:47 ------- > Hello, > > this bug was reported over a year ago. Is this issue > still present with current versions of gcc (3.3)? > Thanks, > > Dara > > > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com
No feedback in 3 months (T-2 days).