Bug 37165 - [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/matrix/matrix-1.c scan-ipa-dump-times matrix-reorg "Flattened 3 dimensions" 1
Summary: [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/matrix/matrix-1.c scan-ipa-dump-tim...
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: gcc
Classification: Unclassified
Component: middle-end (show other bugs)
Version: 4.4.0
: P5 normal
Target Milestone: 4.7.0
Assignee: Not yet assigned to anyone
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-08-19 16:15 UTC by Eric Weddington
Modified: 2011-12-01 12:30 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Host:
Target: avr-*-*
Build:
Known to work:
Known to fail:
Last reconfirmed: 2008-09-26 15:44:32

Attachments
Output file of the test case. (2.38 KB, application/octet-stream)
2008-08-19 16:16 UTC, Eric Weddington 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Eric Weddington 2008-08-19 16:15:50 UTC 
FAIL: gcc.dg/matrix/matrix-1.c scan-ipa-dump-times matrix-reorg "Flattened 3 dimensions" 1. Known to fail on trunk revision 139177. Known to succeed on trunk revision 139150.

Output file only shows "Flattened 2 dimensions", not 3.
Comment 1 Eric Weddington 2008-08-19 16:16:53 UTC 
Created attachment 16100 [details]
Output file of the test case.
Comment 2 Richard Biener 2008-08-22 14:15:52 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37185 ***
Comment 3 Eric Weddington 2008-08-24 18:21:33 UTC 
Patch in bug #37185, comment #3, does not fix this bug. Bug #37185 has to do with transpose-3.c and is an ICE. This bug has to with a failure of matrix-1.c and is not an ICE.
Comment 4 Eric Weddington 2008-08-24 18:31:44 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> Patch in bug #37185, comment #3, does not fix this bug.

Meh. Bad patching job by me. Retesting patch...
Comment 5 Eric Weddington 2008-08-25 00:09:28 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Patch in bug #37185, comment #3, does not fix this bug.
> 
> Meh. Bad patching job by me. Retesting patch...
> 

Confirmed: patch in bug #37185 does not fix this bug. Committed patch may have caused further regressions on AVR target. Will open new bug report.
Comment 6 razya 2008-08-25 08:08:44 UTC 
Subject: Re:  [4.4 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/matrix/matrix-1.c
 scan-ipa-dump-times matrix-reorg "Flattened 3 dimensions" 1

"eric dot weddington at atmel dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote on 
25/08/2008 03:09:29:

> 
> 
> ------- Comment #5 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 
> 2008-08-25 00:09 -------
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > (In reply to comment #3)
> > > Patch in bug #37185, comment #3, does not fix this bug.
> > 
> > Meh. Bad patching job by me. Retesting patch...
> > 
> 
> Confirmed: patch in bug #37185 does not fix this bug. Committed patch 
may have
> caused further regressions on AVR target. Will open new bug report.
> 
> 

Eric,
what platfrom are you running on ?

Thansk,
Razya

> -- 
> 
> eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
>      Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
>    Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2008-08-25 00:09:28
>                date|                            |
> 
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37165
> 
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Comment 7 razya 2008-08-25 08:09:08 UTC 
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > (In reply to comment #3)
> > > Patch in bug #37185, comment #3, does not fix this bug.
> > 
> > Meh. Bad patching job by me. Retesting patch...
> > 
> Confirmed: patch in bug #37185 does not fix this bug. Committed patch may have
> caused further regressions on AVR target. Will open new bug report.


Eric,
what platfrom are you running on ?
Comment 8 Eric Weddington 2008-08-25 12:26:27 UTC 
> Eric,
> what platfrom are you running on ?

It's right there in the "Host" field: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Target is avr.

But I commonly build a toolchain distribution on mingw. Right now I'm using the Linux host mainly for running regtests.
Comment 9 Eric Weddington 2008-09-26 15:44:32 UTC 
Reconfirm test still fails with revision 140691.
Comment 10 Eric Weddington 2011-12-01 12:30:17 UTC 
Failure is no longer showing up in 4.7 trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-11/msg00955.html

Closing bug.