Testcase (test1.c): #include <emmintrin.h> __m128i test_fn1(__m128i x) { __m128i y; return _mm_srl_epi64(x,_mm_set_epi32(0,0,31,31)); } gcc -O1 -c test1.c /tmp/ccBc8BO7.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccBc8BO7.s:7: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `psrlq' gcc -O1 -S test1.s test_fn1: .LFB501: psrlq $133143986207, %xmm0 ret As we can see that the operands are invalid for psrlq. Similar errors occur for other pshifts instructions such as psra*, psrl*, and psll*. A patch to fix this issue is as follows, basically having the right output modifier for these insns in sse.md. diff -purwN gcc-4.2.2-RC-20070909/gcc/config/i386/sse.md gcc-4.2.2-RC-20070909-fix/gcc/config/i386/sse.md --- gcc-4.2.2-RC-20070909/gcc/config/i386/sse.md 2007-09-01 10:28:30.000000000 -0500 +++ gcc-4.2.2-RC-20070909-fix/gcc/config/i386/sse.md 2007-09-17 16:33:26.790117000 -0500 @@ -2724,7 +2724,7 @@ [(set (match_operand:SSEMODE24 0 "register_operand" "=x") (ashiftrt:SSEMODE24 (match_operand:SSEMODE24 1 "register_operand" "0") - (match_operand:TI 2 "nonmemory_operand" "xn")))] + (match_operand:TI 2 "nonmemory_operand" "xN")))] "TARGET_SSE2" "psra<ssevecsize>\t{%2, %0|%0, %2}" [(set_attr "type" "sseishft") @@ -2734,7 +2734,7 @@ [(set (match_operand:SSEMODE248 0 "register_operand" "=x") (lshiftrt:SSEMODE248 (match_operand:SSEMODE248 1 "register_operand" "0") - (match_operand:TI 2 "nonmemory_operand" "xn")))] + (match_operand:TI 2 "nonmemory_operand" "xN")))] "TARGET_SSE2" "psrl<ssevecsize>\t{%2, %0|%0, %2}" [(set_attr "type" "sseishft") @@ -2744,7 +2744,7 @@ [(set (match_operand:SSEMODE248 0 "register_operand" "=x") (ashift:SSEMODE248 (match_operand:SSEMODE248 1 "register_operand" "0") - (match_operand:TI 2 "nonmemory_operand" "xn")))] + (match_operand:TI 2 "nonmemory_operand" "xN")))] "TARGET_SSE2" "psll<ssevecsize>\t{%2, %0|%0, %2}" [(set_attr "type" "sseishft") Is this ok? - Dwarak
I'll backport http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&revision=128328 from PR target/33369 to fix this issue. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 33369 ***