Bug 32607 - [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:487
Summary: [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-c...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 30840
Alias: None
Product: gcc
Classification: Unclassified
Component: tree-optimization (show other bugs)
Version: tree-ssa
: P1 normal
Target Milestone: 4.3.0
Assignee: Not yet assigned to anyone
URL:
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Depends on: 31926
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-07-03 12:00 UTC by gee
Modified: 2007-08-25 09:37 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

See Also:
Host:
Target:
Build:
Known to work:
Known to fail:
Last reconfirmed:


Attachments
preprocessed file (25.55 KB, text/plain)
2007-07-03 12:01 UTC, gee
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description gee 2007-07-03 12:00:13 UTC
$ gcc -mno-cygwin -O2 -c -o libavcodec_static_a-ffv1.o ffv1.i
ffv1.c: In function 'encode_rgb_frame':
ffv1.c:480: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
ffv1.c: In function 'decode_plane':
ffv1.c:784: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast
ffv1.c:784: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast
ffv1.c: In function 'encode_rgb_frame':
ffv1.c:465: internal compiler error: in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:487

Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
Comment 1 gee 2007-07-03 12:01:22 UTC
Created attachment 13833 [details]
preprocessed file
Comment 2 gee 2007-07-03 12:02:07 UTC
svn revision 126249
Comment 3 Andrew Pinski 2007-07-07 17:02:00 UTC
Related to (or a dup of) PR 31926.
Comment 4 eyal 2007-07-14 08:51:09 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> svn revision 126249

Using svn 126635 (and earlier for the last few weeks) I have a similar failure with sample code that I reduced to under 90 lines (no includes). Maybe easier to analyse?
Comment 5 eyal 2007-07-14 14:41:16 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)

The attached sample program ended up against bug 31926...
Comment 6 Martin Michlmayr 2007-08-25 09:37:26 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30840 ***